Pirsgirêka Nermalava Rêvebiriya Projeyê
Sometimes, I wonder if folks who develop project management solutions (PMS) use them. Within the marketing space, project management software is a must – keeping track of ads, posts, videos, whitepapers, use case scenarios, and other projects is a huge issue.
The problem that we seem to run into with all project management software is the hierarchy of the application. Projects are at the top of the hierarchy, then teams, then assets, tasks, and deadlines. That’s not how we work nowadays… especially marketers. Our agency juggles over projects daily. Each team member is probably juggling up to a dozen.
Bi vî awayî Nermalava Birêvebiriya Projeyê bi berdewamî dixebite:
There are three scenarios I can’t seem to ever do with our Pergala Rêveberiya Projeyê:
- Pêşniyara Xerîdar / Proje – client deadlines change all the time, and the importance of each client may differ. I wish I could increase or decrease the importance of a client and have a system that changes the task prioritization for the members who li seranserê projeyan bixebitin gorvî.
- Rêzkirina Task - Divê ez bikaribim li ser endamek nermalava Birêvebiriya Projeyê bitikînim û HEM of erkên wan li seranserê HEM projects projeyên wan bibînim û dûv re jî li gorî bingehek kesane tercîhkirinê sererast bikim.
- Parvekirina Asset - Em pir caran ji bo xerîdar yek çareseriyek pêşdixin û dûv re wê di nav xerîdaran de bikar tînin. Heya nuha, ew hewce dike ku em wê di her projeyê de parve bikin. Ev dîn e ku ez nikarim perçeyek kodê di nav proje û xerîdaran de parve bikim.
Ev rastiya ku em bi rastî çawa dixebitin ev e:
We’ve experimented with developing a task manager outside our project manager to handle some of this, but never seem to have the time to finish the tool. The more we work on it, the more I wonder why we wouldn’t just develop our own project management software altogether. Anyone know of a solution that works closer to the way projects and marketers actually do?